Control · C54

Detect frequent marketing-plan errors

Question addressed

Which errors most often compromise execution before it starts?

Direct answer

A set of 24 controls ranks defects by frequency, severity and correction cost so systemic breaks are addressed first.

Decision supported

01Correct, temporarily accept or block approval according to observed severity.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Which errors most often compromise execution before it starts?

02Decision prepared

Correct, temporarily accept or block approval according to observed severity.

03Deliverable to use

24-control set

Dataset · SQ-54

Rank 24 defects by frequency and severity

A list of errors becomes useful when it separates frequent defects from the rare breaks that make the plan impossible to execute.

Working context

Fictitious set of 30 plans examined with 24 controls grouped into eight families. The frequencies illustrate the sorting method.

  1. 01Observe

    Code every defect against a binary rule and an accessible piece of evidence.

  2. 02Weight

    Combine frequency, severity and propagation towards the other objects.

  3. 03Group

    Handle together the defects that share a single cause.

  4. 04Order

    Correct first the breaks that block funding, capacity or decision.

Original element

Sample of 24 controls over 30 plans

Every row aggregates three homogeneous controls. The defect rate shows the share of plans that failed at least one control in the family.

Calculation methodPriority = frequency × severity from 1 to 5 × propagation from 1 to 3
FamilyControlsPlans failingSeverityPropagationPriority
ObjectivesBaseline · target · deadline21/304384
InitiativesContribution · evidence · stop18/304372
BudgetFull cost · phasing · reserve17/305385
CapacityNet days · roles · bottlenecks22/3053110
RoadmapMilestones · buffers · dependencies16/304243
GovernanceA/R · delegation · escalation14/305370
SteeringThresholds · causes · reforecast19/304251
RisksExposure · trigger · response20/303240
CSV · 8 families · 24 controlsDownload the 24-control dataset
Decision interpretation

01Capacity is the first correction: it is at once frequent, severe and propagating.

02Risks are more often incomplete, but block the initial commitment less directly in this example.

03The ranking must be recalculated on the organisation’s own plans, not copied as a benchmark.

Fictitious data, not representative of a market. They illustrate a control structure.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01No orphan objective

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Funded initiatives

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Covered capacity

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Managed risks

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

24-control set

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.