Control · C81

Visualise coverage of plan objects

Question addressed

Which objectives, initiatives or risks remain orphaned despite an apparently complete plan?

Direct answer

The graph measures coverage of mandatory links and shows how a break propagates to budget, calendar or monitoring.

Decision supported

01Fix first the nodes whose absence exposes several downstream decisions.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Which objectives, initiatives or risks remain orphaned despite an apparently complete plan?

02Decision prepared

Fix first the nodes whose absence exposes several downstream decisions.

03Deliverable to use

Original coverage graph

Original chart · SQ-81

Detect the breaks that propagate through the plan

An object that is present is not necessarily connected. The graph checks ten mandatory links and weights each break by the number of downstream decisions it exposes.

Working context

Fictitious graph of 42 objects: four objectives, eleven initiatives, eight budgets, six roles, seven KPIs and six risks.

  1. 01Model

    Define node types and mandatory links before checking content.

  2. 02Measure

    Calculate coverage, orphans and unqualified links for each family.

  3. 03Propagate

    Count the downstream decisions exposed by each break.

  4. 04Correct

    Treat first the node whose repair restores the most coverage.

Original element

Link coverage and reach of breaks

Budget shows medium coverage, but its three breaks expose nine downstream decisions: it becomes the priority.

Calculation methodCoverage = valid links ÷ required links; reach = downstream decisions exposed
Obj. → init.
91 %1 partial objective
Init. → budget
73 %9 decisions exposed
Init. → role
82 %2 owners missing
Init. → milestone
100 %Full coverage
Obj. → KPI
75 %1 objective not steerable
Risk → response
67 %2 risks accepted by default
Link checkedValidRequiredCoverageReachPriority
Objective → initiative101191%3Medium
Initiative → budget81173%9Critical
Initiative → role91182%5High
Initiative → milestone1111100%0Stable
Objective → KPI3475%4High
Risk → response4667%3High
Decision interpretation

01The priority is not the lowest coverage but the break that exposes the most downstream decisions.

02Connecting three initiatives to their full cost restores nine funding and sequencing decisions.

03The orphaned KPI is corrected next, because it blocks the review of an entire objective.

Fictitious graph. Reach depends on the links defined as mandatory in the plan’s relationship model.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01No orphan objective

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Funded initiatives

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Covered capacity

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Managed risks

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Original coverage graph

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.