Control · C93

Check risk–initiative coverage

Question addressed

Which initiatives concentrate residual exposure not covered by plan controls?

Direct answer

The calculation combines probability, impact, control effectiveness and initiative centrality to prioritise the disruptions that propagate.

Decision supported

01Strengthen control, fund contingency, decouple or reduce exposure.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Which initiatives concentrate residual exposure not covered by plan controls?

02Decision prepared

Strengthen control, fund contingency, decouple or reduce exposure.

03Deliverable to use

Propagated residual-exposure index

Calculation · SQ-93

Weight residual risk by its propagation through the portfolio

Two risks with the same gross exposure are not equivalent if one affects an isolated initiative and the other affects four critical dependencies.

Working context

Fictitious control of five risks linked to eleven initiatives in a launch plan.

  1. 01Link

    Connect every risk to the initiatives, milestones and outcomes actually exposed.

  2. 02Residualise

    Apply documented control effectiveness to gross exposure.

  3. 03Propagate

    Increase exposure according to the number of dependent critical initiatives.

  4. 04Trade off

    Treat propagated exposure first, then verify that the contingency remains fundable.

Original element

Propagated residual exposure of €162k

CRM migration overtakes legal risk after propagation because it exposes four critical initiatives.

Calculation methodPRE = probability × impact × (1 − control effectiveness) × [1 + 0.15 × critical initiatives exposed]
RiskProbabilityImpactControlInitiativesSimple residualPRE
Supplier data35%€180k40%3€37.8k€54.8k
Legal claims20%€350k65%2€24.5k€31.9k
CRM migration25%€240k50%4€30.0k€48.0k
Expert absence30%€120k75%2€9.0k€11.7k
Incomplete measurement40%€90k70%3€10.8k€15.7k
Total€112.1k€162.1k
Decision interpretation

01Propagation adds €50k of exposure that the simple register did not reveal.

02Decoupling two initiatives from CRM migration reduces its PRE from €48k to €39k without changing its probability.

03The minimum contingency is based on the PRE of non-transferable risks, not on the sum of maximum impacts.

Illustrative calculation. Probabilities, effectiveness and propagation coefficients must be documented and sensitivity-tested.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01No orphan objective

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Funded initiatives

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Covered capacity

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Managed risks

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Propagated residual-exposure index

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.