Guide · C26

Build a zero-based marketing budget

Question addressed

How can the budget be rejustified without carrying forward history?

Direct answer

Each expense starts from the objective, initiative, evidence level, full cost and alternative that will not be funded.

Decision supported

01Recompose the budget envelope according to expected contribution.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

How can the budget be rejustified without carrying forward history?

02Decision prepared

Recompose the budget envelope according to expected contribution.

03Deliverable to use

Zero-based grid

Worked example · SQ-26

Rebuild €620k without applying a uniform cut

Zero-based budgeting re-examines the contribution, evidence, full cost and alternative of every line instead of carrying the history forward.

Working context

Costed case: historical budget of €620k, target brought down to €520k.

  1. 01Reset

    Start from zero and rebuild the decision packages.

  2. 02Justify

    Link each line to a result, an item of evidence and a capacity.

  3. 03Compare

    Assess the minimum viable level, the recommended level and the stop option.

  4. 04Rebuild

    Allocate the envelope to the packages retained, not to historical percentages.

Original element

History, uniform cut and zero-based budget

The uniform 16% cut preserves every line but underfunds the best performing ones. Zero-based stops one line and reinforces two levers.

LineHistoryUniform cutZero-basedVarianceDecision
Search€150k€126k€165k+€15kIncrease
Events€170k€143k€70k−€100kOne format only
Content€110k€92k€120k+€10kProtect
ABM€120k€101k€105k−€15kReduce accounts
Sponsorship€70k€58k€0−€70kStop
Total€620k€520k€460k−€160k€60k reserve
Decision interpretation

01Zero-based frees €60k of reserve while reinforcing Search and content.

02The uniform cut keeps unproven sponsorship and weakens the documented levers.

03The reserve funds learning or absorbs variances; it must not be allocated in advance.

Fictitious case. Sunk costs, contractual commitments and obligations must be isolated before rebuilding.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Consistent units

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Internal costs included

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Visible contingency

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Workload per period

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Zero-based grid

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.