Template · C46

Build a marketing risk register

Question addressed

Which risks deserve prevention, contingency or explicit acceptance?

Direct answer

The register quantifies gross exposure, control effectiveness and residual exposure, then connects every risk to an observable trigger.

Decision supported

01Prevent, transfer, mitigate, accept or escalate each material risk.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Which risks deserve prevention, contingency or explicit acceptance?

02Decision prepared

Prevent, transfer, mitigate, accept or escalate each material risk.

03Deliverable to use

Residual risk set

Dataset · SQ-49

Move from gross exposure to residual risk

The register distinguishes initial risk from what remains after existing controls. Priority is based on residual exposure and reaction time.

Working context

Illustrative dataset for an annual plan with €600k and a €6.0m pipeline target.

  1. 01Quantify

    Estimate probability and impact in a common decision unit.

  2. 02Control

    Describe the existing control and estimate its proven effectiveness.

  3. 03Residualise

    Calculate the exposure remaining after the control.

  4. 04Trigger

    Link an observable threshold, owner and funded response.

Original element

Register of six residual risks

An expert departure has a lower gross impact than product delay, but its weak control keeps exposure high.

Calculation methodResidual exposure = probability × impact × (1 − control effectiveness)
RiskProbabilityImpactControlEffectivenessResidualTrigger
Product delay35%€700kRestricted pilot45%€134.8kDelay >15 d
Low conversion30%€900kMessage test35%€175.5kRate <18%
Expert departure20%€500kDocumentation20%€80.0kNotice received
Media cost40%€260kBid cap60%€41.6kCPL >€210
Compliance10%€1,200kLegal review70%€36.0kMajor reservation
Sales capacity25%€600kPriority queue30%€105.0kSAL >140
CSV · exposure, control and triggerDownload the residual-risk register
Decision interpretation

01Low conversion becomes the first priority with €175.5k of residual exposure.

02Compliance remains a potential blocker despite lower expected exposure.

03Every risk above €100k requires a funded and dated contingency plan.

Fictitious data. Probabilities and control effectiveness are judgements to document, not universal frequencies.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Versioned assumptions

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Quantified exposure

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Observable triggers

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Fundable responses

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Residual risk set

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.