Use case · C88

Stress-test the marketing plan

Question addressed

Does the plan remain fundable and executable if several assumptions deteriorate simultaneously?

Direct answer

The stress test combines declining conversion, rising costs, delayed capacity and a budget freeze to measure buffer, outcome and recovery time.

Decision supported

01Keep the plan, activate a contingency, reduce exposure or switch scenario.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Does the plan remain fundable and executable if several assumptions deteriorate simultaneously?

02Decision prepared

Keep the plan, activate a contingency, reduce exposure or switch scenario.

03Deliverable to use

Quantified combined-stress case

Quantified case · SQ-88

Test four simultaneous shocks instead of one isolated decline

Useful stress tests combine correlated assumptions: lower conversion, more expensive media, delayed capacity and a frozen budget. The plan is judged on survival and recoverability.

Working context

Fictitious €1.2m plan targeting €4.8m of pipeline and €1.44m of expected contribution.

  1. 01Choose shocks

    Select severe but plausible disruptions and state their correlations.

  2. 02Recalculate

    Propagate every shock through volumes, costs, workload, schedule and outcome.

  3. 03Measure survival

    Compare contribution, reserve consumed and recovery time.

  4. 04Pre-authorise

    Link every zone to a fundable contingency and a decision-maker.

Original element

A combined shock erases 62% of expected contribution

No isolated shock breaks the plan. Their combination crosses the red threshold and requires portfolio recomposition.

Calculation methodStressed contribution = stressed pipeline × margin − additional costs − delay cost
ScenarioShockPipelineContributionReserveDecision
CentralApproved assumptions€4.80m€1.44m€0kExecute
Conversion−20% win rate€3.84m€1.15m€48kCorrect
Costs+18% media and data€4.80m€1.22m€92kReallocate
CapacityBottleneck delayed 6 weeks€4.22m€1.12m€76kRephase
Combined3 shocks + 10% freeze€3.18m€0.55m€175kActivate contingency
Decision interpretation

01The combined scenario reduces contribution from €1.44m to €0.55m and consumes the entire reserve.

02The contingency removes events, protects tracking and rephases non-critical content.

03If conversion remains below 22% for six weeks, the central scenario is abandoned rather than extended.

Fictitious case. A stress test explores resilience; it does not predict the exact probability of shocks.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Versioned assumptions

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Quantified exposure

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Observable triggers

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Fundable responses

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Quantified combined-stress case

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.