Template · C77

Map marketing-plan stakeholders

Question addressed

Who must decide, contribute, be consulted or simply informed before the plan is committed?

Direct answer

The map combines influence, impact, urgency and availability to distinguish people to engage from information recipients.

Decision supported

01Set the level of involvement, the timing of each request and the deputy for every stakeholder.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Who must decide, contribute, be consulted or simply informed before the plan is committed?

02Decision prepared

Set the level of involvement, the timing of each request and the deputy for every stakeholder.

03Deliverable to use

Stakeholder engagement matrix

Decision grid · SQ-77

Engage the people who can actually swing the plan

A long list of stakeholders dilutes accountability. The matrix distinguishes influence on the decision, impact suffered, urgency of involvement and real availability.

Working context

Fictitious framing of an annual plan involving marketing, sales, finance, product, operations and general management.

  1. 01Name the decision

    Map the people by expected decision, not only by function.

  2. 02Score

    Assess influence, impact and urgency from 1 to 5 using observable facts.

  3. 03Constrain

    Add availability, delegation and deputy before assigning a role.

  4. 04Plan

    Fix the moment, the format and the expected output of each request.

Original element

Six stakeholders, four levels of engagement

The score signals the intensity of engagement. A very influential but unavailable person requires a deputy before validation.

Calculation methodPriority = (influence × 40%) + (impact × 35%) + (urgency × 25%)
StakeholderInfluenceImpactUrgencyAvailabilityEngagement
Executive team544LowDecide + deputy
Finance555MediumCo-design
Sales454HighCo-design
Product443MediumConsult at gates
Marketing ops355HighContribute weekly
Support242HighConsult before launch
CSV · 6 roles · 4 criteriaDownload the engagement matrix
Decision interpretation

01Finance and sales are engaged from the framing stage, because they combine influence and impact.

02General management’s low availability makes a deputy mandatory before the budget committee.

03Support does not need to attend every review, but its opinion becomes blocking before the launch gate.

Fictitious case. The score organises engagement; it replaces neither formal delegations nor consultation obligations.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Identified sponsor

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Dated data

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Visible assumptions

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Declared out-of-scope

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Stakeholder engagement matrix

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.