Control · C06

Assess marketing-plan quality

Question addressed

Under what conditions is a marketing plan defensible?

Direct answer

A defensible plan makes its choices explicit, connects its objects, uses realistic resources, assigns accountability and documents review conditions.

Decision supported

01Determine whether the plan can be approved or must be corrected.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

Under what conditions is a marketing plan defensible?

02Decision prepared

Determine whether the plan can be approved or must be corrected.

03Deliverable to use

Quality grid

Calculation · SQ-01

Measure executable quality on a 100-point scale

Quality is not document length. It measures the strength of the eight links needed to commit resources, execute and revise the plan.

Working context

Illustrative case: an annual B2B plan reviewed before a budget committee. Each dimension is scored from 0 to 5 using observable evidence.

  1. 01Weight

    Give more weight to dimensions that condition resource commitment.

  2. 02Score

    Assign 0 to 5 only from reviewable evidence.

  3. 03Calculate

    Convert each score into points according to its weight, then add the eight dimensions.

  4. 04Decide

    Address any dimension below 50% first, even when the total appears acceptable.

Original element

Executable quality index — 62/100 example

The overall score tracks progress. The dimension threshold prevents a good average from hiding a real inability to execute.

Calculation methodEQI = Σ [(score from 0 to 5 ÷ 5) × dimension weight]
DimensionWeightScore / 5PointsReading
Scope1048Strong
Objectives1539Clarify
Initiatives15412Strong
Budget1526Blocker
Capacity1024Blocker
Roadmap1036Clarify
Governance1048Strong
Monitoring1539Clarify
Decision interpretation

01Below 60: correct before the trade-off.

0260 to 74: conditional approval.

0375 to 89: executable plan with documented reservations.

0490 and above: robust plan, subject to the quality of its assumptions.

Illustrative data. The score evaluates completeness and coherence, not the relevance of the strategy.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Explicit scope

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Named decisions

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Connected objects

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Dated review

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Quality grid

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.