Use case · C52

Prepare a marketing executive committee

Question addressed

How can a substantial briefing pack become explicit, comparable decisions?

Direct answer

The decision brief separates the finding, options, impacts, recommendation, disagreements and review conditions for each expected trade-off.

Decision supported

01Secure a decision, an accountable owner and a due date for every item submitted.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

How can a substantial briefing pack become explicit, comparable decisions?

02Decision prepared

Secure a decision, an accountable owner and a due date for every item submitted.

03Deliverable to use

Decision note template

Downloadable template · SQ-55

Condense the dossier into three assigned decisions

The note does not summarise every analysis. For each trade-off it presents comparable options, consequences and the recommendation.

Working context

Illustrative template for a 45-minute executive committee deciding budget, timing and risk level.

  1. 01Isolate

    State each decision with a verb, object, amount and date.

  2. 02Compare

    Present two or three options using the same units and assumptions.

  3. 03Recommend

    Name the proposed choice, trade-offs and conditions.

  4. 04Trace

    Record the decision, owner, effective date and next review.

Original element

Decision note for three trade-offs

The format keeps the committee focused on the decisions actually expected and preserves useful disagreements without burying the options.

DecisionOptionsCompared impactRecommendationConditionDecision-maker
Approve envelope€480k / €540k / €600k€5.42m / €5.86m / €6.20m€540kConversion ≥ 22%Executive management
Authorise launchFull / pilot / deferExposure €180k / €65k / €20kPilotCompliance signedOffer sponsor
Fund capacityInternal / external / rephase€90k / €115k / €40kExternal reinforcement12 weeks maximumMarketing management
CSV · options, impacts and conditionsDownload the decision note
Decision interpretation

01The committee can cover all three decisions in 30 minutes and reserve 15 minutes for disagreements.

02Every recommendation contains a measurable review condition.

03The detailed dossier remains an evidence appendix; it does not replace a clearly stated decision.

Fictitious example. Amounts and decision rights must follow the organisation’s actual delegations.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Quantified starting point

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Comparable options

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Explicit consequences

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Assigned decision

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Decision note template

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.