Framework 04 / 12

Compare initiatives by contribution, cost and feasibility

Decision question

Which initiatives deserve the available resources, in what order and under which conditions?

Decision

Fund, defer, test or stop each initiative.

Trade off a portfolio rather than piling up actions with no stopping rule. This step produces reviewable commitments and flags information that remains too fragile to justify a trade-off.

Expected outputs

01Ranked portfolio

02Sensitivity analysis

03Stop-doing list

04Stage gates

Original chart · SQ-33

Identify the portfolio’s efficient frontier

An initiative is efficient when no other option delivers more contribution for lower cost and workload.

Working context

Original comparison of seven initiatives normalised by expected contribution and resources consumed.

  1. 01Normalise

    Convert cost and workload into one resource index.

  2. 02Position

    Compare expected contribution with the resource index.

  3. 03Eliminate

    Identify initiatives dominated by a stronger option.

  4. 04Compose

    Build the constrained portfolio on the frontier.

Original element

Relative contribution of efficient initiatives

Search, conversion, CRM and resized ABM form the frontier. The event is dominated.

Conversion
6218 resources
CRM
6932 resources
Search
7848 resources
ABM
8867 resources
Event
5882 resources
InitiativeResource indexContribution / 100DominatedDecision
Conversion1862NoFund
CRM3269NoFund
Search4878NoFund
Content5264Yes, by SearchKeep targeted
ABM: 15 accounts6788NoConditional funding
Partners7074Yes, by ABMPilot
Event8258YesDefer
Decision interpretation

01The event consumes more resources for less contribution than Search.

02ABM remains efficient only after being reduced to 15 accounts.

03The frontier does not decide alone: risk, dependencies and diversification still require a trade-off.

Fictitious data. The resource index combines cost and workload using the weighting documented in the portfolio.

Minimum controls

What the plan must make visible.

01Contribution rated

Status, evidence, owner and next review date.

02Full cost

Status, evidence, owner and next review date.

03Evidence qualified

Status, evidence, owner and next review date.

04Stopping criterion

Status, evidence, owner and next review date.

Related resources

Weighted comparator and decision content.

Next step · 05Plan coherence