Template · C18

Build a marketing initiative portfolio

Question addressed

How do you consolidate initiatives so they can be compared?

Direct answer

Every initiative uses the same record: contribution, impact, full cost, workload, timing, risk, evidence, dependencies and reversibility.

Decision supported

01Create a consistent basis for trade-offs without double counting.

02The rule, the evidence and the next review date stay visible.

How to use this

Move from the question to the deliverable.

01Starting point

How do you consolidate initiatives so they can be compared?

02Decision prepared

Create a consistent basis for trade-offs without double counting.

03Deliverable to use

Normalised portfolio

Dataset · SQ-22

Read eight initiatives as a portfolio, not as a list

The dataset compares contribution, full cost, workload, evidence, risk and dependencies at a single level of detail.

Working context

Illustrative portfolio of €505k and 785 days before the decision.

  1. 01Normalise

    Use the same units and horizons for every initiative.

  2. 02Qualify

    Separate observed evidence, analogy and opinion.

  3. 03Visualise

    Compare expected value with the consumption of resources.

  4. 04Assemble

    Keep a coherent set under constraints, not only the best scores.

Original element

Portfolio of eight comparable initiatives

The portfolio exceeds the available resources by €105k and 145 days. Two initiatives must be deferred or resized.

InitiativeContribution / 5CostWorkloadEvidence / 5RiskDecision
High-intent search4.0€95k80 days4MediumFund
Partner programme4.2€70k125 days2HighPilot
Content redesign3.4€45k140 days5LowFund
Enterprise webinars3.8€60k95 days3MediumTest
30-account ABM4.6€110k160 days3HighResize
CRM reactivation3.9€35k70 days4LowFund
Owned event3.1€75k85 days2HighDefer
Conversion optimisation4.1€15k30 days5LowFund
CSV · 8 initiativesDownload the initiative portfolio
Decision interpretation

01Conversion optimisation is funded despite a limited absolute impact, because its cost and its evidence are favourable.

02ABM stays strategic but must move from 30 to 15 accounts to respect capacity.

03The event is deferred: high cost, weak evidence and low reversibility.

Fictitious dataset. Scores must never replace obligations, dependencies or portfolio decisions.

Coherence controls

Minimum conditions before validation.

01Non-redundant criteria

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

02Full cost

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

03Qualified evidence

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

04Sensitivity tested

The status, the evidence and the owner must be available for review.

Usable deliverable

Output produced

Normalised portfolio

Explore the decision further with an interactive control, or start from a structured template to produce your deliverable.